Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Bashing Goldman Sachs Is Simply a Game for Fools



Bashing Goldman Sachs Is Simply a Game for Fools
By Michael Lewis - Jul 27, 2009
Bloomberg Opinion
www.bloomberg.com


America stands at a crossroads, and Goldman Sachs now owns both of them. In choosing which road to take, ordinary Americans must not be distracted by unproductive resentment toward the toll-takers. To that end we at Goldman Sachs would like to dispel several false and insidious rumors.

Rumor No. 1: Goldman Sachs controls the U.S. government.

Every time we hear the phrase the United States of Goldman Sachs we shake our heads in wonder. Every ninth-grader knows that the U.S. government consists of three branches. Goldman owns just one of these outright; the second we simply rent, and the third we have no interest in at all. (Note there isn't a single former Goldman employee on the Supreme Court.)

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE

Goldman Sachs... the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

The "Vampire Squid" at 142 years
By Joel Stonington 9/21/2011


Goldman Sachs (GS), the most profitable investment bank in Wall Street history, went through a bit of a rough patch during the economic downturn. The firm posted its first quarterly loss since going public and handed over the largest fine ever collected by the Securities & Exchange Commission. From a purely economic angle, it appears that Goldman is now back on track, with $8.35 billion in profit last year. In the court of public opinion, however, Goldman Sachs is still on trial.

The company was called the greedy cause of the downturn for selling bad debt and then betting against it. Rolling Stone framed Goldman as a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. That's not to mention a 650-page Senate report that hangs over the firm.

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE

The Ever Increasing Parallels Between AIG And Greece 2/10/2010

The Ever Increasing Parallels Between AIG And Greece... And The CDS Puppetmaster Behind It All
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/08/2010


My comment...
Goldman Sachs & AIG (2008) and now Goldman Sachs & Greek currency swaps (2002-2005), which were used to hide the true extent of Greek government debt. What will be revealed next? Did Goldman Sachs create similar currency swaps for Italy and Spain? For more, Google: goldman sachs greece currency swap

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Is the US Monetary System on the Verge of Collapse?

Is the US Monetary System on the Verge of Collapse?
By David Galland of Casey Research
John Mauldin's Investors Insight, Sept 13, 2011

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE

My comment...
Reading this "Outside the Box" piece on John Mauldin's website gave me a new appreciation for how close the US monetary system, and by extension the global financial system, is to a complete collapse. This is scary.

An Impeccable Disaster... by Paul Krugman 9/11/2011

An Impeccable Disaster
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: September 11, 2011


On Thursday Jean-Claude Trichet, the president of the European Central Bank or E.C.B. — Europe’s equivalent to Ben Bernanke — lost his sang-froid. In response to a question about whether the E.C.B. is becoming a “bad bank” thanks to its purchases of troubled nations’ debt, Mr. Trichet, his voice rising, insisted that his institution has performed “impeccably, impeccably!” as a guardian of price stability.

Indeed it has. And that’s why the euro is now at risk of collapse.

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE

My comment...
Paul Krugman sees the equivalent of bank runs in Spain and Italy as investors, fearing sovereign debt defaults, demand higher interest rates to hold Spanish & Italian government bonds. "We're not talking about a crisis that will unfold over a year or two; this thing could come apart in a matter of days. And if it does, the whole world will suffer."

Big Bank Chart... by Barry Ritholtz 9/12/2011



Big Bank Chart
By Barry Ritholtz - September 12th, 2011


My comment...

Do you remember Washington Mutual, Wachovia, Merrill Lynch, Countrywide, Bear Stearns? They have all been absorbed by four too-big-to-fail banks: Citigroup, JPMorganChase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo. Don't forget those names because we will be bailing them out again.

Fed Policy - No Theory, No Evidence, No Transmission Mechanism

Fed Policy - No Theory, No Evidence, No Transmission Mechanism
John P. Hussman, Ph.D.
September 12, 2011
All rights reserved and actively enforced.


Undoubtedly, one of the main factors prompting a benign response to what is now virtually certain recession and virtually certain Greek default is the hope that the Fed will launch some new monetary intervention. While Wall Street appears to view the present weakness as a replay of 2010, it is strikingly clear that the evidence tells a different story, with a broad ensemble of data implying near-certainty of oncoming recession (see An Imminent Downturn ).

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE

My comment...
With $1.6 Trillion of excess bank reserves, and 10-year Treasuries yielding 1.9%, the Federal Reserve is simply an Emperor with no Clothes. We may still get QE3... but it will have zero effect, other than briefly stimulating the stock market. Whoopee!

Monday, September 12, 2011

S&P 500 Index and Dollar Cost Averaging 9-12-2011

Whatever investments your portfolio comprises, dollar cost averaging (DCA) is a useful strategy for minimizing asset purchases when the market is overvalued. DCA allows you to invest equal dollar amounts at regular intervals (monthly, quarterly) regardless of the current market conditions. In this way you buy more shares, bonds, etc. when the market is oversold (cheaper), and fewer shares when the market is overbought (more expensive).

DCA does not guarantee that you will make money however. If you are buying into a secular (long-term) bear market, or even into a trading-range market, you may lose money, or make no money. As an example, let's look at the S&P 500 Index over the past fifteen years, from September, 1996 to September, 2011.

The following chart shows the monthly adjusted close prices for the S&P 500 Index (Yahoo! Finance symbol ^GSPC) between September, 1996 (687.33) and September, 2011 (1154.23). The average index price over this 15-year period is 1160, and the standard deviation is 200. The average price plus/minus one standard deviation (960 to 1360) is shown as the blue shaded rectangle. This means that 67% of the monthly prices fall within this range. NOTE: The large size of the standard deviation reflects the high volatility of the index during this fifteen-year period.



There are 180 months in this fifteen year period. Let's say your investment plan is to invest $1000 each month in the S&P 500 Index, and you have faithfully followed that plan over the past fifteen years. You would have bought $1000 worth of index shares each month... fewer shares when the index was expensive, and more shares when the index was cheaper. Let's see how you would have done:

Index Starting Value: $687.33
Index Ending Value: $1,154.23
Total Shares Purchased: 160.40
Total Dollars Invested: $180,000
Current Market Value: $185,142
Total Profit: $5,142
Total Percent Profit: 2.86%
Annual Percent Profit: 0.19%

So, over the past fifteen years, your investment would have returned less than 0.2% annually. But, looking on the bright side, you have participated in a forced savings program, and you now have a retirement account with $185,000 in it.

What are the lessons going forward?

(1) The S&P 500 Index has been highly volatile over the past fifteen years. We've experienced three asset bubbles and two crashes, and we may well be in the early stages of the third crash.

(2) The S&P 500 Index is currently priced at its long-term average. This means that buying the index now virtually guarantees sub-par long term returns.

(3) A better strategy than DCA might be to watch the index and only purchase shares when the index is currently BELOW its fifteen-year average value of 1160. Clearly this means taking a more active approach to your portfolio purchases, monitoring the index each month before making your purchase decision.

Monday, September 5, 2011

Government Sues Biggest U.S. Banks Over Mortgage-Backed Investments 9/02/2011

Government Sues Biggest U.S. Banks Over Mortgage-Backed Investments
September 02, 2011


In a sweeping move that opens a new front on the housing crisis, the U.S. government on Friday sued 17 financial firms, including the largest U.S. banks, for selling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac billions of dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities that turned toxic when the housing market collapsed.

Among the 17 targeted by the lawsuits were Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JP Morgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs.

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE

My comment...
So... in Oct. 2008 Congress passed a $700 Billion law to bail out these too-big-to-fail banks. And now we're going to sue them because they sold toxic securities to Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. We should have simply let them go bankrupt three years ago and then taken them apart... brick by brick.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

HFT and Leveraged ETFs... Newest Financial Weapons

The Newest Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction

By Doug Kass 08/31/11 - 01:00 PM EDT




The toxic combination of price momentum-based high-frequency trading (HFT) strategies and the proliferation of leveraged ETFs has served to launch the newest forms of financial weapons of mass destruction, and they're alienating legions of investors.



Since the beginning of 2007, domestic equity mutual funds have had net outflows of more than $400 billion (in the same period, $835 billion of fixed-income funds have been purchased! That spread between stock outflows and bond inflows -- $1.235 trillion (in 4.5 years) -- is unprecedented in the annals of financial history.



READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE

Has the Fed Started QE3? 9-01-2011

Has the Fed Started QE3? 9-01-2011

By Bud Conrad, Casey Research




The Fed surprised the market by extending its policy of 0 to 0.25% Fed funds rate to mid-2013. The way the Fed manages to drive rates lower is to buy Treasuries with newly created money – driving the price up and the rates down. The big question is whether the policy will have a sizeable effect on markets. The chart below shows the historical jump in the Fed’s combined policy tools that were used to lower rates and bail out financial institutions through a variety of programs. These include the big purchase of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) called QE1 and the large purchase of Treasuries called QE2.



READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE